Perception
For months now, the Clinton campaign has been using all their connections with major news networks like ABC, CNN, MSNBC and even FOX to create the perception that she is bound to win the democratic primary election. Evidence of this is widely supported by the amount of coverage giving to Senator Clinton as oppose to the other candidates of the same party.
These news networks have done a very good job in quashing very important negative stories about Senator Clinton that give the American people an idea of what kind of president she will be if she ever gets elected. In the last presidential primary debate in Nevada, it was clear CNN was out to uplift her sinking campaign from the deep sea. The moderator Wolf Blitz was clearly bias, repeatedly interrupting candidates like Fmr Senator John Edwards and Senator Barack Obama while they tried to answer questions. He could not ensure that all candidates have the same amount of time like in previous debates. More so he could not control the Clinton mob that had been hired.
The second arm of the Clinton campaign is major polling companies. I need not mention the connections that exist between the major polling companies and the Clintons. It is a given that even a third grader could prove this just by spending as little as 15mins on Google. Polls area a great tool to spread inevitability and the Clinton camp will not stop in maximizing their gains from this arm.
Reality
It is common sense to know that when a campaign fights so much to create a perception that does not exist, then they are truly weak. It is called propaganda. The Nazi and Allied nations both used propaganda during WW1 and WW11. Such propaganda is still been used today. The Clinton camp knows that her support around the nation is very weak. She has no real support among the American people that could enable her unite this country again.
To test this finding for yourself, start by asking ten educated people of various works of life if they are ever going to vote for her as president. After ten days do the sum and compare her support. You will be surprise to find out that although she has been in the national scene for over a decade, the majority of people do not support her.
Another question I want you to ask your self is this. If she is such a great candidate as portrayed by the media, then why does she have to rely largely on lobbyist to fund her campaign? She defend them publicly and campaign contribution date proves that she has raked in the highest amount of money from all the major corporations ( Pharmaceutical companies, Defense industries etc) Common sense tells us that if any candidate enjoys so much support among the American people then a bulk or her funds should come from ordinary Americans and not lobbyist.
Historically, national polls have not been accurate in determining the nominee in either party. Very often we are reminded by experts that Caucus and Primaries are hard to poll.
It is time for the American people to start thinking for themselves. Start making decisions because of what you know is accurate and not what the media tells you to do. Thank God with the internet, candidates websites and other news networks one can have accurate information about candidates and their positions on issues that affect our lives.
4 comments:
AMEN!!!!!
All six CNN's "undecided voters" = Democratic operatives
http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2007/11/cnn-plants-questions-to-protect-hillary.html
UPDATES BELOW - CNN hits bottom and digs:
All six debate questioners appear to be Democratic Party operatives. So much for "ordinary people, undecided voters". To paraphrase Junior Soprano, CNN is so far up the DNC's hind end, Howard Dean can taste hair gel.
In a nutshell, CNN's six "undecided voters" were:
A Democratic Party bigwig
An antiwar activist
A Union official
An Islamic leader
A Harry Reid staffer
A radical Chicano separatist
Wow. This looks "rather" like a scandal. Hot Air:
The CNN debate was the worse I have seen. The initial questions were designed to be confrontational instead of informational.
Almost every question was preface with Candidate 1 you stated this about Candidate 2, Candidate 3 you stated this about Candidate 1 and so on. The american people did not need Wolf explaining what had been said, we needed Wolf to ask straight forward questions and allow us to make our decisions. What a scam. We are very intelligent people, contrary to the belief of the government and media and it was clear that the Clinton's had plants all over the auditorium and the "boos" were so obvious - why didn't the Hill just say upfront that she had paid people to come to the debate and support her!! the question about the Diamonds was such a plant that a 3 year old would have recognized the scam. This debate was so bad that Wolf should not even consider having another debate. GA in VA.
trying to find dirt - your blog sucks!!!
Post a Comment